Defendant
Jaspreet SINGH
Date of birth 1984-03-07
Address 86b Newquay Road, London, SE6 2NP
Postcode SE6 2NP
Case summary
Reference 2500560882
Platform libra
Source
Magistrates
Court City of London Magistrates' Court
First listed 2025-09-17
Latest listing 2025-09-17
Force matching
Prosecuting force City of London Police
Defendant area Metropolitan Police
Out of area — forces differ
URN track Libra Case Number (year 25, serial 00560882) - no force code embedded (0.00)
Text track court 'City of London Magistrates' Court' is in the City of London Police area (0.45)
Postcode track postcode SE6 2NP -> Metropolitan Police (0.95)
Offence
Between 11/06/2024 and 19/05/2025 at within CCC were an officer, namely director of a company to which Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 applied, namely FMU Ltd and who was in default in that the company failed to keep a register of people with significant control over the company with required particulars of any entity that was a registrable relevant legal entity in relation to the company being
Timeline (1 event)
2025-09-17
list
City of London Magistrates' Court
Between 11/06/2024 and 19/05/2025 at within CCC were an officer, namely director of a company to which Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 applied, namely FMU Ltd and who was in default in that the company failed to keep a register of people with significant control over the company with required particulars of any entity that was a registrable relevant legal entity in relation to the company being entered in the register before the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the day after the co
Between 13/01/2025 and 19/05/2025 at within CCC, were an officer, namely director of a company, namely FMU Limited and who was in default in that the company refused an inspection without charge of its PSC register. Contrary to sections 790Q(1) and 790Q(2) of the Companies Act 2006. Between 13/01/2025 and 19/05/2025 at within CCC the defendant, was an officer, namely director of a company, namely FMU Limited and who was in default in that the company refused an inspection without charge of its P