Defendant
Mohamed AHMED
Date of birth 1975-06-09
Address 6 Chichester Road, London, NW6 5QN
Postcode NW6 5QN
Case summary
Reference 2500558667
Platform libra
Source
Magistrates
Court City of London Magistrates' Court
First listed 2025-09-17
Latest listing 2025-09-17
Force matching
Prosecuting force City of London Police
Defendant area Metropolitan Police
Out of area — forces differ
URN track Libra Case Number (year 25, serial 00558667) - no force code embedded (0.00)
Text track court 'City of London Magistrates' Court' is in the City of London Police area (0.45)
Postcode track postcode NW6 5QN -> Metropolitan Police (0.95)
Offence
Between 04/10/2024 and 03/08/2025 at within CCC were an officer, namely Director of a company to which Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 applied, namely Mya Textiles Ltd and who was in default in that the company failed to keep a register of people with significant control over the company with required particulars of any individual with significant control over the company who was 'registrable'
Timeline (1 event)
2025-09-17
list
City of London Magistrates' Court
Between 04/10/2024 and 03/08/2025 at within CCC were an officer, namely Director of a company to which Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 applied, namely Mya Textiles Ltd and who was in default in that the company failed to keep a register of people with significant control over the company with required particulars of any individual with significant control over the company who was 'registrable' in relation to the company, being entered in the register before the end of the period of 14 days be
Between 07/03/2025 and 03/08/2025 at within CCC, were an officer, namely Director of a company, namely Mya Textiles Ltd and who was in default in that the company refused an inspection without charge of its PSC register. Contrary to sections 790Q(1) and 790Q(2) of the Companies Act 2006. Between 07/03/2025 and 03/08/2025 at within CCC the defendant, was an officer, namely Director of a company, namely Mya Textiles Ltd and who was in default in that the company refused an inspection without charg